Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Panel
titleFrom Marc Brierley, re: Changing template type for assessmentExplaining what Assessment Types are

Date Oct 11, 2006 8:37 PM EDT
From Marc Brierley <brierley@stanford.edu>
Subject Re: Changing template type for assessment

Body I think there was some confusion about which Assessment Type (aka
templates) is being addressed. There is a 'Quiz' assessment type and
a 'Timed Test' assessment type. It is true that the Quiz type does
not have Timed Assessment turned on and probably should. One of our
language instructors here at Stanford has given us the same feedback.

We changed the name of Templates to 'Assessment Types' into SAMigo
starting with version 2.2 to help jump-start their usage and
understanding. We did this because we found that many people,
including those who deploy SAMigo, didn't understand what Assessment
Types were for or how to use them. Assessment Types are comprised of
a set of default values and sub-seclection of the assessment settings
for a particular kind of assessment. They do not contain pre-authored
content. Assessment types are to meant to standardize and simplify
the configuration of an assessment for instructors, not necessarily
by instructors. Assessment types are best configured by an
instructional designer or a savvy admin who pays close attention to
the needs of his/her constituency. All of the selections for these
settings are summarized here:

http://issues.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/9T8

Given that we've only had these pre-defined types in for one version,
we are expecting that they will need to be tweaked for their most
general usage. However, we expect and hope that savvy institutions
will take the opportunity to configure Assessment Types to their
needs and make instructors' lives more simple. A language class quiz
will probably be different from a chemistry quiz and an institution
should feel free to construct their own tailored assessment types.

We will watch these OOTB Assessment Types, however, among the other
usability issues that we've heard about:

http://issues.sakaiproject.org/confluence/x/fGw

As to why instructors can't change the Assessment Type from which
their assessment was created...once an assessment gets created from a
type, those settings and defaults are a copy from the original. We
didn't want subsequent changes to Assessment Types to change already
existing assessments. I do see the problem this creates if an
assessment has already been created and additional functionality is
desired. I'm open to suggestions for how this problem might be solved.

Hope this helps,
-mARC

Panel
titleLisa's summary of the state of question pool import in 2.1.x

Date Sep 20, 2006 1:49 PM EDT
From Lisa Wilson
Subject Question Pool Import for Sakai 2.1.x
Hello everyone;

I'd like to let you know that I'm working on question pool import code
for Sakai 2.1.x for implementation on our UC Davis instance. The v2.2
version was coded first, but needs QA and code review for corrections.
I'm not sure when it will be released to testing in collab, and we're on
2.1.x here, so I've only tested locally.

What UCDavis Question Pool import does:
Based on review of BlackBoard and Respondus xml import documents I've
received, the question pool import follows the same ASI format as the
current QTI v1.2 quiz import. This means that an assessment may be
imported as a quiz or as a question pool. It also means that an exported
quiz can be imported as a question pool. The advantage to faculty would
be that they can save existing quizzes into a pool without having to
copy questions in one at a time.
A limitation is that only single-section imports will work. All the
translated documents I have from other systems appear to be
single-section, so this may not be a migration issue.

There is no conversion code yet for BlackBoard or Respondus yet to my
knowledege. (I'm out of sync with current development progress as I'm
recovering from foot surgery. (smile) If someone has done this already,
please let me know!) I do have a local convertor written in ColdFusion
for metadata translation and anticipate using the same logic in Samigo.

I'd like to hear from members who are migrating content from other
systems, to get a better idea of what the priorities are for translation
(i.e., BlackBoard, WebCT, Respondus, etc.)

Also, could I get a heads up on who might be interested in Sakai v2.1.x
import question pool code once we're past the QA phase here?

As we move forward with import/export for Samigo, I'm looking forward to
continuing discussion with Steve Lay, Zach Thomas, Joshua Ryan, and
others regarding QTI v2.x and Common Cartridge, to improve my
understanding and to see migration with media content become a reality.
I hope to see you all in Atlanta this December!

Lisa


Lisa J. Wilson
Programmer, Sakai Development Team
IET Mediaworks, UC Davis